Rodriguez v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided August 10, 2022·No. 1:22-cv-06508·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ERIC RODRIGUEZ, Movant, 20-CR-0077 (SHS) -against- 22-CV-6508 (SHS) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ORDER TO AMEND Respondent. SIDNEY H. STEIN, United States District Judge: Movant, currently incarcerated at USP-Hazelton, brings this pro se letter in which he challenges the judgment entered in United States v. Rodriguez, No. 1:20-CR-0077, 74 (S.D.N.Y. July 22, 2021). For the following reasons, the letter-motion (ECF 1) is designated as a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Movant must notify the Court, within 60 days, if he wishes to withdraw the application rather than have it recharacterized as a § 2255 motion. The Court also grants Movant an opportunity to file an amended § 2255 motion within 60 days of the date of this order. STANDARD OF REVIEW A prisoner in federal custody may bring a motion under § 2255 attacking his conviction or sentence on the grounds that it violates the Constitution or United States law, was imposed without jurisdiction, exceeds the maximum penalty, or is otherwise subject to collateral attack. 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Under Rule 4(b) of the Rules Governing § 2255 Proceedings, the Court has the authority to review and deny a § 2255 motion before directing an answer “[i]f it plainly appears from the motion, any attached exhibits, and the record of prior proceedings that the moving party is not entitled to relief.” Rules Governing § 2255 Proceedings, Rule 4(b); see Acosta v. Nunez, 221 F.3d 117, 123 (2d Cir. 2000). The Court is obliged, however, to construe pro se pleadings liberally and interpret them “to raise the strongest arguments they suggest.”

-|-

Triestman v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 470 F.3d 471, 474 (2d Cir. 2006) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted) (emphasis in original); see Green v. United States, 260 F.3d 78, 83 (2d Cir. 2001). Nevertheless, a pro se litigant is not exempt “from compliance with relevant rules of procedural and substantive law.” Triestman, 470 F.3d at 477 (citing Traguth v. Zuck, 710 F.2d 90, 95 (2d Cir. 1983)). DISCUSSION A. Designation of application as § 2255 motion Movant’s application can be construed as a motion for relief under § 2255 because he seeks to challenge his conviction and sentence. See Jiminian v. Nash, 245 F.3d 144, 146-47 (2d Cir. 2001) (Section 2255 “is generally the proper vehicle for a federal prisoner’s challenge to his conviction and sentence’). Movant contends, among other grounds for relief, that counsel was ineffective in failing to file an appeal as requested. Before recharacterizing an application as a § 2255 motion, “the district court must notify the pro se litigant that it intends to recharacterize the pleading, warn the litigant that this recharacterization means that any subsequent § 2255 motion will be subject to the restrictions on ‘second or successive’ motions, and provide the litigant an opportunity to withdraw the motion or to amend it so that it contains all the § 2255 claims he believes he has.” Castro v. United States, 540 U.S. 375, 383 (2003). If Movant does not want to pursue relief under § 2255, he may notify the Court in writing within 60 days that he wishes to withdraw the application. See Adams v. United States, 155 F.3d 582, 584 (2d Cir. 1998) (per curiam). If Movant does not inform the Court of his intent within 60 days, the application will remain designated as a motion under § 2255.

-2-

B. Leave to amend A federal prisoner’s § 2255 motion must conform to the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings for the United States District Courts. Rule 2(b) of these rules requires a petition to specify all of a movant’s available grounds for relief, setting forth the facts supporting each of the specified grounds and stating the relief requested. A § 2255 motion must permit the Court and the respondent to comprehend both the movant’s grounds for relief and the underlying facts and legal theory supporting each ground so that the issues presented in the motion can be adjudicated. Because a federal prisoner generally has only one opportunity for a full adjudication of his grounds for relief under § 2255, the Court grants Movant an opportunity to file an amended motion under § 2255 in which he specifies all of his available grounds for relief and sets for the facts supporting each ground and the relief requested. If Movant wishes to file an amended § 2255 motion, it must be filed within 60 days of this order. CONCLUSION The Court finds that Movant’s application (ECF 1) can be construed as a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. If Movant does not want to pursue relief under § 2255, he may notify the Court in writing within 60 days that he wishes to withdraw his motion. If Movant does not inform the Court of his intent within 60 days, the Court will construe this motion as a § 2255 motion. Movant is granted leave to file an amended motion under § 2255 containing all of the grounds on which he seeks relief. The amended motion must be submitted to this Court’s Pro Se Intake Unit within 60 days of the date of this order, be captioned as an “Amended Motion” and bear the same docket number as this order. An Amended Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 form is

-3-

attached to this order. If Movant fails to comply with this order within the time allowed, and cannot show good cause to excuse such failure, the motion will be denied. Because Movant has not at this time made a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962).

Dated: New York, New York August 9, 2022 SO ORDERED: , poe

Sidney HH. Stein, USD

-4-

10/07) Page 1 Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct a Sentence By a Person in Federal Custody (Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255)

Instructions 1. To use this form, you must be a person who is serving a sentence under a judgment against you in a federal court. You are asking for relief from the conviction or the sentence. This form is your motion for relief. 2. You must file the form in the United States district court that entered the judgment that you are challenging.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodriguez v. United States, (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

Rodriguez v. United States (Rodriguez v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related