Rodgers v. Rodgers
107 N.E.2d 83, 304 N.Y. 591, 1952 N.Y. LEXIS 840
Opinion
[593] Motion by defendant granted, and plaintiff’s appeal in its entirety dismissed upon the ground that a stipulation for judgment absolute cannot be given in this action for a separation since a counterclaim for annulment remains untried. (Weiman v. Weiman, 295 N. Y. 150.)
Cross motion by plaintiff granted and defendant’s appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. [See 304 N. Y. 716.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rodgers v. Rodgers, 107 N.E.2d 83, 304 N.Y. 591, 1952 N.Y. LEXIS 840 (N.Y. 1952).
107 N.E.2d 83 (Rodgers v. Rodgers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Zientara v. Zientara
257 N.E.2d 50 (New York Court of Appeals, 1970)
Statter v. Statter
143 N.E.2d 10 (New York Court of Appeals, 1957)