Rodgers v. Rodgers

New York Court of Appeals

Rodgers v. Rodgers

107 N.E.2d 83, 304 N.Y. 591, 1952 N.Y. LEXIS 840

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 29, 1952

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 107 N.E.2d 83 (Rodgers v. Rodgers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rodgers v. Rodgers, 107 N.E.2d 83, 304 N.Y. 591, 1952 N.Y. LEXIS 840 (N.Y. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

[593]*593Motion by defendant granted, and plaintiff’s appeal in its entirety dismissed upon the ground that a stipulation for judgment absolute cannot be given in this action for a separation since a counterclaim for annulment remains untried. (Weiman v. Weiman, 295 N. Y. 150.)

Cross motion by plaintiff granted and defendant’s appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. [See 304 N. Y. 716.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[593]*593Motion by defendant granted, and plaintiff’s appeal in its entirety dismissed upon the ground that a stipulation for judgment absolute cannot be given in this action for a separation since a counterclaim for annulment remains untried. (Weiman v. Weiman, 295 N. Y. 150.)

Cross motion by plaintiff granted and defendant’s appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. [See 304 N. Y. 716.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

107 N.E.2d 83, 304 N.Y. 591, 1952 N.Y. LEXIS 840, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodgers-v-rodgers-ny-1952.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack