Home/New York Court of Appeals/Zientara v. Zientara

Zientara v. Zientara

257 N.E.2d 50, 26 N.Y.2d 707, 308 N.Y.S.2d 871, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1604
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 21, 1970
StatusPublished

This text of 257 N.E.2d 50 (Zientara v. Zientara) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zientara v. Zientara, 257 N.E.2d 50, 26 N.Y.2d 707, 308 N.Y.S.2d 871, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1604 (N.Y. 1970).

Opinion

Appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. A stipulation for judgment absolute may not be given in a matrimonial action. (See, e. g., Friedman v. Friedman, 240 N. Y. 608; Weiman v. Weiman, 295 N. Y. 150; Rodgers v. Rodgers, 304 N. Y. 591; see, also, Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, pp. 286-287; 7 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N. Y. Civ. Prac., par. 5601.13.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Weiman v. Weiman
65 N.E.2d 754 (New York Court of Appeals, 1946)
Friedman v. Friedman
148 N.E. 725 (New York Court of Appeals, 1925)
Rodgers v. Rodgers
107 N.E.2d 83 (New York Court of Appeals, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
257 N.E.2d 50, 26 N.Y.2d 707, 308 N.Y.S.2d 871, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1604, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zientara-v-zientara-ny-1970.