Zientara v. Zientara
257 N.E.2d 50, 26 N.Y.2d 707, 308 N.Y.S.2d 871, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1604
Opinion
Appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. A stipulation for judgment absolute may not be given in a matrimonial action. (See, e. g., Friedman v. Friedman, 240 N. Y. 608; Weiman v. Weiman, 295 N. Y. 150; Rodgers v. Rodgers, 304 N. Y. 591; see, also, Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, pp. 286-287; 7 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N. Y. Civ. Prac., par. 5601.13.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Zientara v. Zientara, 257 N.E.2d 50, 26 N.Y.2d 707, 308 N.Y.S.2d 871, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1604 (N.Y. 1970).
257 N.E.2d 50 (Zientara v. Zientara) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Weiman v. Weiman
65 N.E.2d 754 (New York Court of Appeals, 1946)
Friedman v. Friedman
148 N.E. 725 (New York Court of Appeals, 1925)
Rodgers v. Rodgers
107 N.E.2d 83 (New York Court of Appeals, 1952)