Robinson v. State

70 S.E.2d 514, 209 Ga. 48, 1952 Ga. LEXIS 396
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedApril 16, 1952
Docket17826
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 70 S.E.2d 514 (Robinson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robinson v. State, 70 S.E.2d 514, 209 Ga. 48, 1952 Ga. LEXIS 396 (Ga. 1952).

Opinion

Candlee, Justice.

1. Although the main case here involves an indictment for rape, there has been no trial, and the Supreme Court has jurisdiction in criminal cases as such only when there has been a conviction *49 of a capital felony. Loomis v. State, 203 Ga. 394 (47 S. E. 2d, 58); Morgan v. State, 201 Ga. 65 (38 S. E. 2d, 810); art. 6, sec. 2, par. 4, Constitution of 1945 (Code, Ann., § 2-3704).

No. 17826. Submitted April 15, 1952 Decided April 16, 1952. Bruce Edwards, Jesse T. Edwards, Joe R. Edwards, for plaintiff in error. Roy Leathers, Solicitor-General, contra.

2. While the foregoing clause of the Constitution gives the Supreme Court jurisdiction to review constructions of the State and Federal Constitutions, yet, where only an application of plain provisions of the Constitution is involved, the Court of Appeals and not the Supreme Court has jurisdiction. Dade County v. State of Georgia, 201 Ga. 241 (39 S. E. 2d, 473); Stanley v. Amos, 204 Ga. 652 (51 S. E. 2d, 395); Jackson v. State, 203 Ga. 570 (47 S. E. 2d, 588); Boyett v. State, 205 Ga. 370 (53 S. E. 2d, 919); Sellers v. State, 207 Ga. 249 (61 S. E. 2d, 145).

3. Applying the foregoing rulings to the instant case, where there has been no conviction of a capital felony, and the construction of no provision of the Constitution is drawn in question, but only an application of the plain provisions of the due-process and other clauses of the State and Federal Constitutions is sought, the Supreme Court is without jurisdiction and the writ of error must be

Transjerred to the Court oj Appeals.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hart v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia, 2025
George v. State
333 S.E.2d 141 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1985)
Patterson v. State
287 S.E.2d 7 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1982)
Philpot v. State
193 S.E.2d 844 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1972)
Spell v. State
167 S.E.2d 642 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1969)
Ledford v. JM MUSE CORPORATION
163 S.E.2d 815 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1968)
Prather v. State
155 S.E.2d 862 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1967)
Carswell v. Canno
135 S.E.2d 282 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1964)
Civils v. Fulton County
130 S.E.2d 220 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1963)
McCrary v. the State
114 S.E.2d 133 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1960)
Atlanta Newspapers, Inc. v. Grimes
110 S.E.2d 343 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1959)
Perkins v. Hattiesburg Brick Work
96 S.E.2d 361 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1957)
Giles v. State
93 S.E.2d 739 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1956)
Williamson v. Yakupian
84 S.E.2d 15 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1954)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
70 S.E.2d 514, 209 Ga. 48, 1952 Ga. LEXIS 396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-state-ga-1952.