Stanley v. Amos

Supreme Court of Georgia

Stanley v. Amos

51 S.E.2d 395, 204 Ga. 652, 1949 Ga. LEXIS 322

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 10, 1949

Docket16440.

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 51 S.E.2d 395 (Stanley v. Amos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stanley v. Amos, 51 S.E.2d 395, 204 Ga. 652, 1949 Ga. LEXIS 322 (Ga. 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

Atkinson, Presiding Justice.

In the present case, growing out of a judgment based on alleged contractual liability, the record shows that the only basis for invoking this court’s jurisdiction under the Code (Ann. Supp.), § 2-3704, is a certain action of the Judge of the Municipal Court of Macon which is alleged to be in violation of named provisions of the State and Federal Constitutions; and it being further shown that these questions involve the application of the State and Federal Constitutions to the facts of the case, rather than the construction of any constitutional provision, the Court of Appeals and not this court has jurisdiction, and accordingly, the case is transferred to that court. Dade County v. State of Georgia, 201 Ga. 241 (2a) (39 S. E. 2d, 473), and citations on p. 245.

Transferred to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atkinson, Presiding Justice.

In the present case, growing out of a judgment based on alleged contractual liability, the record shows that the only basis for invoking this court’s jurisdiction under the Code (Ann. Supp.), § 2-3704, is a certain action of the Judge of the Municipal Court of Macon which is alleged to be in violation of named provisions of the State and Federal Constitutions; and it being further shown that these questions involve the application of the State and Federal Constitutions to the facts of the case, rather than the construction of any constitutional provision, the Court of Appeals and not this court has jurisdiction, and accordingly, the case is transferred to that court. Dade County v. State of Georgia, 201 Ga. 241 (2a) (39 S. E. 2d, 473), and citations on p. 245.

Transferred to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 S.E.2d 395, 204 Ga. 652, 1949 Ga. LEXIS 322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stanley-v-amos-ga-1949.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack