Carswell v. Canno

Supreme Court of Georgia

Carswell v. Canno

135 S.E.2d 282, 219 Ga. 698, 1964 Ga. LEXIS 377

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 6, 1964

Docket22314, 22346

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 135 S.E.2d 282 (Carswell v. Canno) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carswell v. Canno, 135 S.E.2d 282, 219 Ga. 698, 1964 Ga. LEXIS 377 (Ga. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Head, Presiding Justice.

The Court of Appeals, and not this court, has jurisdiction of the subject matter of this litigation. The contention in a motion and in the bill of exceptions that the trial judge in refusing to allow an amendment to an intervention, which intervention had been previously dismissed, denied the intervenor due process of law under the State and Federal Constitutions does not constitute a case involving “the construction of the Constitution of the State of Georgia or of the United States, . . .” Constitution, Art. VI, Sec. II, Par. IV (Code Ann. § 2-3704). Norman v. State, 171 Ga. 527 (156 SE 203); Dunn Motors, Inc. v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 174 Ga. 743 (163 SE 906); Western & Atlantic R. v. Leslie, 176 Ga. 385 (168 SE 15); Chastain v. Alford, 191 Ga. 677 (13 SE2d 769); Jarvis v. State, 197 Ga. 704 (30 SE2d 484); Dixon v. State, 207 Ga. 192 (60 SE2d 439); Robinson v. State, 209 Ga. 48 (70 SE2d 514); Civils v. Fulton County, 218 Ga. 705 (130 SE2d 220).

Transferred to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Head, Presiding Justice.

The Court of Appeals, and not this court, has jurisdiction of the subject matter of this litigation. The contention in a motion and in the bill of exceptions that the trial judge in refusing to allow an amendment to an intervention, which intervention had been previously dismissed, denied the intervenor due process of law under the State and Federal Constitutions does not constitute a case involving “the construction of the Constitution of the State of Georgia or of the United States, . . .” Constitution, Art. VI, Sec. II, Par. IV (Code Ann. § 2-3704). Norman v. State, 171 Ga. 527 (156 SE 203); Dunn Motors, Inc. v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 174 Ga. 743 (163 SE 906); Western & Atlantic R. v. Leslie, 176 Ga. 385 (168 SE 15); Chastain v. Alford, 191 Ga. 677 (13 SE2d 769); Jarvis v. State, 197 Ga. 704 (30 SE2d 484); Dixon v. State, 207 Ga. 192 (60 SE2d 439); Robinson v. State, 209 Ga. 48 (70 SE2d 514); Civils v. Fulton County, 218 Ga. 705 (130 SE2d 220).

Transferred to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

135 S.E.2d 282, 219 Ga. 698, 1964 Ga. LEXIS 377, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carswell-v-canno-ga-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack