Chastain v. Alford
This text of 191 Ga. 677 (Chastain v. Alford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Jurisdiction of a ease which ordinarily is in the Court of Appeals is not conferred on the Supreme Court by a statement in the bill of exceptions, following an assignment of error, “that said ruling is contrary to law, contrary to the constitution of the State of Georgia, and violative of article 1, section 1, paragraph 3 thereof, and violation [violative?] of article 5 of the constitution of the United States, which declares that no person shall be deprived of property without due process of law, and error is assigned on said ruling for said reason.” This is not a case where the constitutionality of any law is drawn in question.
Transferred to the Court of Appeals.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
191 Ga. 677, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chastain-v-alford-ga-1941.