Robinson v. State
661 So. 2d 378, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 10670, 1995 WL 595039
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Robinson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 609 So. 2d 89 →
Opinion
We have reviewed the issues the appellant presents on this appeal from convictions for two counts of possession of cocaine with intent to sell and two counts of sale of cocaine as well as the consecutive habitual offender sentences imposed. We find no reversible error but do find error in the costs imposed.
Accordingly, we affirm the convictions and sentences but remand for reimposition of costs in accord with Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Robinson v. State, 661 So. 2d 378, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 10670, 1995 WL 595039 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).
661 So. 2d 378 (Robinson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Reyes v. State
655 So. 2d 111 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)