Robinson v. State

609 So. 2d 784, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13747, 1992 WL 385621
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Robinson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 556 So. 2d 450
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 30, 1992·No. No. 92-3285·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We grant a belated appeal because the trial court’s final order denying relief under Rule 3.850 failed to contain the required explanation of appellate rights. On the merits, we reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing or, alternatively, for attachment of those record documents showing conclusively that appellant is not entitled to relief.

LETTS, POLEN and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robinson v. State, 609 So. 2d 784, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13747, 1992 WL 385621 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

609 So. 2d 784 (Robinson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.