Robinson v. State
572 So. 2d 992, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9608, 1990 WL 211470
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 21, 1990·No. No. 89-03045·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence for one count of sale of cocaine. We vacate the conviction and sentence for possession of cocaine on the authority of V.A.A. v. State, 561 So.2d 314 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). As in V.A.A. v. State, we certify to the Florida Supreme Court the following question of great public importance:
[993]*993WHEN A DOUBLE JEOPARDY VIOLATION IS ALLEGED BASED ON THE CRIMES OF SALE AND POSSESSION (OR POSSESSION WITH INTENT TO SELL) OF THE SAME QUANTUM OF CONTRABAND AND THE CRIMES OCCURRED AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF SECTION 775.021, FLORIDA STATUTES (SUPP.1988), IS IT IMPROPER TO CONVICT AND . SENTENCE FOR BOTH CRIMES?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Robinson v. State, 572 So. 2d 992, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9608, 1990 WL 211470 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).
572 So. 2d 992 (Robinson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Robinson
581 So. 2d 158 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)
Holmes v. State
575 So. 2d 332 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)