Robinson v. State
558 So. 2d 196, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1871, 1990 WL 31709
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Robinson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 516 So. 2d 20 →
Opinion
Appellant argues, and the state concedes, that the trial court erred in convicting and sentencing appellant for both sale of cocaine and possession of cocaine with intent to sell, where the cocaine in question consisted of a single “rock.” See Wright v. State, 557 So.2d 906 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). Accordingly, we direct the trial court to vacate the judgment and sentence for possession with intent to sell.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Robinson v. State, 558 So. 2d 196, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1871, 1990 WL 31709 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).
558 So. 2d 196 (Robinson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wright v. State
557 So. 2d 906 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)