Robinson v. State

659 So. 2d 472, 1995 WL 497207
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 23, 1995·No. 94-01824·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

659 So.2d 472 (1995)

Randolph ROBINSON, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 94-01824.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 23, 1995.

Bjorn E. Brunvand, Clearwater, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Dale E. Tarpley, Sr. Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant claims that the trial court should have allowed him to withdraw his guilty plea. He also raises other issues.

Any alleged infirmity concerning the intelligent or voluntary nature of a plea must first be raised in the trial court by a motion to withdraw the plea or a motion for post-conviction relief. Since the appellant has not made a prior motion to withdraw his plea, the issue of whether his plea was voluntary cannot be entertained on appeal. Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla. 1979); Counts v. State, 376 So.2d 59 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal without prejudice so that the appellant may file the appropriate motion in the trial court.

Appeal dismissed.

THREADGILL, C.J., and DANAHY and BLUE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robinson v. State, 659 So. 2d 472, 1995 WL 497207 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

659 So. 2d 472 (Robinson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Parsons v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015
Lawrence v. State
821 So. 2d 477 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Metzgar v. State
741 So. 2d 1181 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Williams v. State
730 So. 2d 704 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Robinson v. State
685 So. 2d 1352 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)