Robinson v. Cahill

360 A.2d 400, 70 N.J. 464, 1976 N.J. LEXIS 210

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 15, 1976·Published·Cited by 31 cases

Opinion

ORDER

This matter having been duly considered by the Court, it is ORDERED that the order of this Court, dated May 13, 1976 [70 N. J. 155], is amended only in the following respect;

*465 Paragraph 1 on page 6 will now read as follows:

1. Payment of principal, interest and redemption of school bonds, anticipation notes and like obligations, existing as of July 1, 1976, or bonds authorized prior to July 1, 1976 and thereafter issued or notes in anticipation of such bonds thereafter issued, or costs of issuance thereof.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This matter having been duly considered by the Court, it is ORDERED that the order of this Court, dated May 13, 1976 [70 N. J. 155], is amended only in the following respect;

*465 Paragraph 1 on page 6 will now read as follows:

1. Payment of principal, interest and redemption of school bonds, anticipation notes and like obligations, existing as of July 1, 1976, or bonds authorized prior to July 1, 1976 and thereafter issued or notes in anticipation of such bonds thereafter issued, or costs of issuance thereof.

Robinson v. Cahill, 360 A.2d 400, 70 N.J. 464, 1976 N.J. LEXIS 210 (N.J. 1976).

Pincite

360 A.2d 400 (Robinson v. Cahill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Connecticut Coalition for Justice in Education Funding, Inc. v. Rell

990 A.2d 206 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2010)

Lobato v. State

218 P.3d 358 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 2009)

Abbott v. Burke

960 A.2d 360 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2008)

Lobato v. State

216 P.3d 29 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 2008)

Baer v. Klagholz