Robinson 436677 v. Brown

W.D. Michigan

Robinson 436677 v. Brown

DecidedNovember 24, 2021

Docket1:20-cv-00878

StatusUnknown

This text of Robinson 436677 v. Brown (Robinson 436677 v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Michigan primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robinson 436677 v. Brown, (W.D. Mich. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

TRON ROBINSON,

Petitioner, Case No. 1:20-cv-878 v. Hon. Hala Y. Jarbou MIKE BROWN,

Respondent. ____________________________/ ORDER This is a habeas corpus petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation (R&R) on October 25, 2021, recommending that this Court equitably toll the period of limitation for July 31, 2020, to September 4, 2020, and deny the habeas petition as meritless (ECF No. 13). The R&R was duly served on the parties. No objections have been filed, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and the deadline for doing so expired on November 8, 2021. On review, the Court concludes that the R&R correctly analyzes the issues and makes a sound recommendation. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the R&R (ECF No. 13) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court and the petition for habeas corpus relief (ECF No. 1) is DENIED for the reasons stated in the R&R. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) is DENIED as to each issue asserted. Petitioner has not demonstrated that reasonable jurists would find the Court’s rulings debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473 (2000); Murphy v. Ohio, 263 F.3d 466, 466-67 (6th Cir. 2001). The Court declines to certify that any issue Petitioner might raise on appeal would be frivolous. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 445 (1962).

Dated: November 24, 2021 /s/ Hala Y. Jarbou HALA Y. JARBOU UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

TRON ROBINSON,

Petitioner, Case No. 1:20-cv-878 v. Hon. Hala Y. Jarbou MIKE BROWN,

Respondent. ____________________________/ ORDER This is a habeas corpus petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation (R&R) on October 25, 2021, recommending that this Court equitably toll the period of limitation for July 31, 2020, to September 4, 2020, and deny the habeas petition as meritless (ECF No. 13). The R&R was duly served on the parties. No objections have been filed, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and the deadline for doing so expired on November 8, 2021. On review, the Court concludes that the R&R correctly analyzes the issues and makes a sound recommendation. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the R&R (ECF No. 13) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court and the petition for habeas corpus relief (ECF No. 1) is DENIED for the reasons stated in the R&R. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) is DENIED as to each issue asserted. Petitioner has not demonstrated that reasonable jurists would find the Court’s rulings debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473 (2000); Murphy v. Ohio, 263 F.3d 466, 466-67 (6th Cir. 2001). The Court declines to certify that any issue Petitioner might raise on appeal would be frivolous. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 445 (1962).

Dated: November 24, 2021 /s/ Hala Y. Jarbou HALA Y. JARBOU UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Robinson 436677 v. Brown, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-436677-v-brown-miwd-2021.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack