Robertson v. United States ex rel. Watson
176 L. Ed. 2d 1024, 130 S. Ct. 2184, 560 U.S. 272, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 366, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 4169, 78 U.S.L.W. 4428
Opinions
OPINION OF THE COURT
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Robertson v. United States ex rel. Watson, 176 L. Ed. 2d 1024, 130 S. Ct. 2184, 560 U.S. 272, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 366, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 4169, 78 U.S.L.W. 4428 (U.S. 2010).
176 L. Ed. 2d 1024 (Robertson v. United States ex rel. Watson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ellingburg v. United States
Supreme Court, 2026
In Re Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation v. the State of Texas
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2025
SPARGER-WITHERS v. TAYLOR
S.D. Indiana, 2024
People v. Faranso
240 Cal. App. 4th 456 (California Court of Appeal, 2015)
In re Taylor
73 A.3d 85 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2013)
Laurie Tsao v. Desert Palace, Inc.
698 F.3d 1128 (Ninth Circuit, 2012)
Wanke, Industrial, Commercial, Residential, Inc. v. Keck
209 Cal. App. 4th 1151 (California Court of Appeal, 2012)
In re Jackson
51 A.3d 529 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2012)
In Re Robertson
19 A.3d 751 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2011)
McDonald v. City of Chicago
561 U.S. 742 (Supreme Court, 2010)