Heath v. Alabama
470 U.S. 1026, 105 S. Ct. 1390, 84 L. Ed. 2d 780, 53 U.S.L.W. 3634, 1985 U.S. LEXIS 1243
This text of 470 U.S. 1026 (Heath v. Alabama) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Heath v. Alabama, 470 U.S. 1026, 105 S. Ct. 1390, 84 L. Ed. 2d 780, 53 U.S.L.W. 3634, 1985 U.S. LEXIS 1243 (1985).
Opinion
Sup. Ct. Ala. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Cer-[1027]*1027tiorari granted limited to Question II. In addition, the parties are requested to address the following question: “What is the applicability, if any, of the dual sovereignty doctrine to successive prosecutions by two different states?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
470 U.S. 1026, 105 S. Ct. 1390, 84 L. Ed. 2d 780, 53 U.S.L.W. 3634, 1985 U.S. LEXIS 1243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heath-v-alabama-scotus-1985.