Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Roberts v. State

Roberts v. State

140 S.E. 900, 37 Ga. App. 341, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 660
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Roberts v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 41 Ga. App. 364 →
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 15, 1927·No. 18462·Published

Opinion

Luke, J.

Tlie defendant was convicted on circumstantial evidence wliicli fails to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the guilt of the accused; and therefore the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodioorth, J., eoneur. G. E. Parrish, for plaintiff in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roberts v. State, 140 S.E. 900, 37 Ga. App. 341, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 660 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).

140 S.E. 900 (Roberts v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.