Roberts v. State

133 S.E. 274, 35 Ga. App. 393, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 385
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 12, 1926
Docket17244
StatusPublished

This text of 133 S.E. 274 (Roberts v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roberts v. State, 133 S.E. 274, 35 Ga. App. 393, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 385 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

Bbotles, C. J.

The accused was convicted of the offense of buying seed-cotton after sunset and before sunrise. The only evidence tending to show his guilt was an alleged confession, not corroborated by any other evidence. It is well-settled law in this State that a confession by the accused is not in itself sufficient to establish the corpus delicti, and that the corpus delicti must be proved before the accused can be lawfully convicted. Davenport v. State, 12 Ga. App. 102, 104 (76 S. E. 756). It follows that the defendant’s conviction was unauthorized, and that the overruling of his motion for a new trial was error.

Judgment reversed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davenport v. State
76 S.E. 756 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
133 S.E. 274, 35 Ga. App. 393, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-state-gactapp-1926.