Roberts v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Roberts v. State

148 S.E. 282, 39 Ga. App. 693, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 520

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 15, 1929

Docket19629

StatusPublished

This text of 148 S.E. 282 (Roberts v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roberts v. State, 148 S.E. 282, 39 Ga. App. 693, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 520 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. Under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court a refusal to direct a verdict is never error.

2. In the light of the facts of the case and the entire charge of the court, the alleged errors of commission and omission in the charge do not require a reversal of the judgment.

3. The evidence, while in sharp conflict, authorized the verdict, and the overruling of the motion for a new trial was not error for any reason assigned. Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

1. Under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court a refusal to direct a verdict is never error.

2. In the light of the facts of the case and the entire charge of the court, the alleged errors of commission and omission in the charge do not require a reversal of the judgment.

3. The evidence, while in sharp conflict, authorized the verdict, and the overruling of the motion for a new trial was not error for any reason assigned. Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

148 S.E. 282, 39 Ga. App. 693, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-state-gactapp-1929.