In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 10-639V Filed: April 26, 2016
* * * * * * * * * * * * * UNPUBLISHED M.R., a minor, by and through his natural * parents and guardians, ANN ROBERTS, * and DUSTIN ROBERTS,1 * * Petitioners, * Chief Special Master Dorsey * v. * Decision on Proffer; Damages; * Diphtheria-Tetanus-Acellular- SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Pertussis (DTaP) Vaccine; AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Haemophilus Influenza Type B (Hib) * Vaccine; Measles Mumps Rubella Respondent. * (MMR) Vaccine; Varicella Vaccine; * Prevnar Vaccine; Seizure Disorder * * * * * * * * * * * * * Lawrence G. Michel, Kennedy, Berkeley, et al., Salina, KS, for petitioner. Alexis B. Babcock, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for respondent.
DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES2
On September 23, 2010, Ann Roberts (“petitioner”), as the parent and natural guardian of M.R., a minor, filed a petition pursuant to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.3 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to 34 (2012). Petitioner alleged that diphtheria-tetanus-acellular-pertussis (“DTaP”), measles-mumps-rubella (“MMR”), haemophilus influenza type B (“Hib”), and varicella vaccinations on February 21, 2008, and a Prevnar vaccination on March 17, 2008,
1 The case caption has been changed pursuant to the May 4, 2016, Order granting petitioner’s motion to amend the case caption to include M.R.’s father, Dustin Roberts.
2 Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the undersigned’s action in this case, the undersigned intends to post this ruling on the website of the United States Court of Federal Claims, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). As provided by Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14 days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b).
3 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2012) (Vaccine Act or the Act). All citations in this decision to individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa. caused M.R. to suffer from a seizure disorder. Petition at 1-2. The undersigned issued a Ruling on Entitlement on September 24, 2014, finding petitioner entitled to compensation based on an injury caused-in-fact by a covered vaccine.
On April 22, 2016, respondent filed a Proffer on an award of compensation, indicating that petitioner has agreed to compensation as follows: $160,000.00 in actual and projected pain and suffering; $45,732.29 in past unreimbursable expenses; and $8,816.20 to satisfy the State of Kansas Medicaid lien. Proffer at ¶ IA-D.
Pursuant to the terms in the Proffer, attached hereto as Appendix A, the undersigned awards petitioner the following compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a):
1. A lump sum payment of $160,000.00, representing compensation for pain and suffering, in the form of a check payable to petitioner as guardian/conservator of M.R., for the benefit of M.R.;
2. A lump sum payment of $45,732.29 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, representing compensation for past unreimbursed expenses; and
3. A lump sum payment of $8,816.20, representing compensation for satisfaction of the State of Kansas Medicaid lien, payable jointly to petitioner and
Kansas Medicaid Subrogation 6021 S.W. 29th Street Suite A, #373 Topeka, KS 66614 Attn: Nikki Thyfault
The clerk of the court shall enter judgment in accordance herewith.4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master
4 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.
2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS _________________________________________ ) M.R., a minor, by and through his ) natural parent and guardian, ANN ROBERTS, ) ) Petitioner, ) No. 10-639V v. ) Chief Special Master Dorsey ) SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ) HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) __________________________________________)
RESPONDENT’S PROFFER OF DAMAGES
I. Items of Compensation
A. Pain and Suffering
Respondent proffers that M.R. should be awarded $160,000.00 in actual and projected
pain and suffering. This amount reflects that the award for projected pain and suffering has been
reduced to net present value. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees.
B. Past Unreimbursable Expenses
Petitioner has provided evidence of past unreimbursable expenses related to M.R.’s
vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded past
unreimbursable expenses in the amount of $45,732.29. Petitioner agrees.
C. Lost Wages
The parties agree that based upon the evidence of record, M.R.’s vaccine-related injury
has not impaired his earning capacity. Therefore, respondent proffers that petitioner should be
awarded no lost future earnings as provided under the Vaccine Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-
15(a)(3)(A). Petitioner agrees.
1 D. Medicaid Lien
Respondent proffers that M.R. should be awarded funds to satisfy the State of Kansas lien
in the amount of $8,816.20, which represents full satisfaction of any right of subrogation,
assignment, claim, lien, or cause of action the State of Kansas may have against any individual
as a result of any Medicaid payments the State of Kansas has made to or on behalf of M.R. from
the date of his eligibility for benefits through the date of judgment in this case as a result of his
vaccine-related injury suffered on or about February 21, 2008, under Title XIX of the Social
Security Act. Petitioner agrees.
II. Form of the Award
The parties recommend that compensation provided to petitioner should be made through
a lump sum payment as described below and request that the Chief Special Master’s decision
and the Court’s judgment award the following: 1
A. A lump sum payment of $160,000.00, representing compensation for pain and
suffering, in the form of a check payable to petitioner as guardian/conservator of M.R., for the
benefit of M.R.. No payments shall be made until petitioner provides respondent with
documentation establishing that she has been appointed as the guardian/conservator of M.R.’s
estate. If petitioner is not authorized by a court of competent jurisdiction to serve as
guardian/conservator of the estate of M.R., any such payment shall be made to the party or
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 10-639V Filed: April 26, 2016
* * * * * * * * * * * * * UNPUBLISHED M.R., a minor, by and through his natural * parents and guardians, ANN ROBERTS, * and DUSTIN ROBERTS,1 * * Petitioners, * Chief Special Master Dorsey * v. * Decision on Proffer; Damages; * Diphtheria-Tetanus-Acellular- SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Pertussis (DTaP) Vaccine; AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Haemophilus Influenza Type B (Hib) * Vaccine; Measles Mumps Rubella Respondent. * (MMR) Vaccine; Varicella Vaccine; * Prevnar Vaccine; Seizure Disorder * * * * * * * * * * * * * Lawrence G. Michel, Kennedy, Berkeley, et al., Salina, KS, for petitioner. Alexis B. Babcock, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for respondent.
DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES2
On September 23, 2010, Ann Roberts (“petitioner”), as the parent and natural guardian of M.R., a minor, filed a petition pursuant to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.3 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to 34 (2012). Petitioner alleged that diphtheria-tetanus-acellular-pertussis (“DTaP”), measles-mumps-rubella (“MMR”), haemophilus influenza type B (“Hib”), and varicella vaccinations on February 21, 2008, and a Prevnar vaccination on March 17, 2008,
1 The case caption has been changed pursuant to the May 4, 2016, Order granting petitioner’s motion to amend the case caption to include M.R.’s father, Dustin Roberts.
2 Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the undersigned’s action in this case, the undersigned intends to post this ruling on the website of the United States Court of Federal Claims, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). As provided by Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14 days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b).
3 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2012) (Vaccine Act or the Act). All citations in this decision to individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa. caused M.R. to suffer from a seizure disorder. Petition at 1-2. The undersigned issued a Ruling on Entitlement on September 24, 2014, finding petitioner entitled to compensation based on an injury caused-in-fact by a covered vaccine.
On April 22, 2016, respondent filed a Proffer on an award of compensation, indicating that petitioner has agreed to compensation as follows: $160,000.00 in actual and projected pain and suffering; $45,732.29 in past unreimbursable expenses; and $8,816.20 to satisfy the State of Kansas Medicaid lien. Proffer at ¶ IA-D.
Pursuant to the terms in the Proffer, attached hereto as Appendix A, the undersigned awards petitioner the following compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a):
1. A lump sum payment of $160,000.00, representing compensation for pain and suffering, in the form of a check payable to petitioner as guardian/conservator of M.R., for the benefit of M.R.;
2. A lump sum payment of $45,732.29 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, representing compensation for past unreimbursed expenses; and
3. A lump sum payment of $8,816.20, representing compensation for satisfaction of the State of Kansas Medicaid lien, payable jointly to petitioner and
Kansas Medicaid Subrogation 6021 S.W. 29th Street Suite A, #373 Topeka, KS 66614 Attn: Nikki Thyfault
The clerk of the court shall enter judgment in accordance herewith.4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master
4 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.
2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS _________________________________________ ) M.R., a minor, by and through his ) natural parent and guardian, ANN ROBERTS, ) ) Petitioner, ) No. 10-639V v. ) Chief Special Master Dorsey ) SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ) HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) __________________________________________)
RESPONDENT’S PROFFER OF DAMAGES
I. Items of Compensation
A. Pain and Suffering
Respondent proffers that M.R. should be awarded $160,000.00 in actual and projected
pain and suffering. This amount reflects that the award for projected pain and suffering has been
reduced to net present value. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees.
B. Past Unreimbursable Expenses
Petitioner has provided evidence of past unreimbursable expenses related to M.R.’s
vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded past
unreimbursable expenses in the amount of $45,732.29. Petitioner agrees.
C. Lost Wages
The parties agree that based upon the evidence of record, M.R.’s vaccine-related injury
has not impaired his earning capacity. Therefore, respondent proffers that petitioner should be
awarded no lost future earnings as provided under the Vaccine Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-
15(a)(3)(A). Petitioner agrees.
1 D. Medicaid Lien
Respondent proffers that M.R. should be awarded funds to satisfy the State of Kansas lien
in the amount of $8,816.20, which represents full satisfaction of any right of subrogation,
assignment, claim, lien, or cause of action the State of Kansas may have against any individual
as a result of any Medicaid payments the State of Kansas has made to or on behalf of M.R. from
the date of his eligibility for benefits through the date of judgment in this case as a result of his
vaccine-related injury suffered on or about February 21, 2008, under Title XIX of the Social
Security Act. Petitioner agrees.
II. Form of the Award
The parties recommend that compensation provided to petitioner should be made through
a lump sum payment as described below and request that the Chief Special Master’s decision
and the Court’s judgment award the following: 1
A. A lump sum payment of $160,000.00, representing compensation for pain and
suffering, in the form of a check payable to petitioner as guardian/conservator of M.R., for the
benefit of M.R.. No payments shall be made until petitioner provides respondent with
documentation establishing that she has been appointed as the guardian/conservator of M.R.’s
estate. If petitioner is not authorized by a court of competent jurisdiction to serve as
guardian/conservator of the estate of M.R., any such payment shall be made to the party or
parties appointed by a court of competent jurisdiction to serve as guardian/conservator of the
estate of M.R. upon submission of written documentation of such appointment to the Secretary;
B. A lump sum payment of $45,732.29 payable to petitioner, representing
compensation for past unreimbursed expenses;
1 Should M.R. die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses and future pain and suffering.
2 C. A lump sum payment of $8,816.20, representing compensation for satisfaction of
the State of Kansas Medicaid lien, payable jointly to petitioner and
Kansas Medicaid Subrogation 6021 S.W. 29th Street Suite A, #373 Topeka, KS 66614 Attn: Nikki Thyfault
Petitioner agrees to endorse this payment to the State of Kansas.
III. Summary of Recommended Payments Following Judgment
A. Lump sum paid to petitioner as court-appointed guardian/conservator of M.R.’s estate: $ 160,000.00
B. Medicaid Lien: $ 8,816.20
C. Past unreimbursed expenses $ 45,732.29
Respectfully submitted,
BENJAMIN C. MIZER Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General
RUPA BHATTACHARYYA Director Torts Branch, Civil Division
VINCENT J. MATANOSKI Deputy Director Tort Branch, Civil Division
LINDA S. RENZI Senior Trial Counsel Torts Branch, Civil Division
3 s/ Alexis B. Babcock ALEXIS B. BABCOCK Senior Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 Dated: April 22, 2016 Telephone: (202) 616-7678