Roberts v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided December 5, 2014·No. 12-879·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 12-879V (Not to be published)

***************************** * JANIE L. COSCIA ROBERTS, * Filed: November 14, 2014 * Petitioner, * * Decision by Stipulation; Damages; v. * Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine; * Transverse Myelitis (“TM”) SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND * HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * *****************************

Diana S. Sedar, Maglio Christopher and Toale, PA, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner.

Gordon E. Shemin, U.S. Dep’t of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

On December 14, 2012, Janie L. Coscia Roberts filed a petition seeking compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.2 Petitioner alleges that as a result of receiving the influenza (“flu”) vaccine on November 18, 2010, she suffered from Transverse Myelitis (“TM”), and that she experienced the effects of this injury for more than six months.

Respondent denies that the flu vaccine caused Petitioner’s alleged TM, or any other injury, and further denies that Petitioner’s current disabilities are sequelae of a vaccine-related

1 Because this ruling contains a reasoned explanation for my action in this case, it will be posted on the website of the United States Court of Federal Claims, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). As provided by 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4)(B), however, the parties may object to the inclusion of certain kinds of confidential information. To do so, Vaccine Rule 18(b) provides that each party has 14 days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the ruling will be available to the public. Id. 2 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program comprises Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755 (codified as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. ' 300aa-10 – 34 (2006)) [hereinafter “Vaccine Act” or “the Act”]. Individual sections references hereafter will be to ' 300aa of the Act. injury. Nonetheless both parties, while maintaining their above-stated positions, agreed in a stipulation (filed November 14, 2014) that the issues before them can be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding Petitioner compensation.

I have reviewed the file, and based upon that review, I conclude that the parties’ stipulation (as attached hereto) is reasonable. I therefore adopt it as my decision in awarding damages on the terms set forth therein.

The stipulation awards:

A lump sum of $100,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. §300aa-15(a).

Stipulation ¶ 8.

I approve a Vaccine Program award in the requested amounts set forth above to be made to Petitioner. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment herewith.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by each filing (either jointly or separately) a notice renouncing their right to seek review.

2 Case 1:12-vv-00879-UNJ Document 36 Filed 11/14/14 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

) JANIEL. COSCIA ROBERTS, ) ) Petitioner, ) No. 12-879V ) Special Master Corcoran v. ) ) SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ) HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. )

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

1. Petitioner filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the National Vaccine Injury

Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 to 34 (the ''Vaccine Program"). The petition

seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to petitioner's receipt of the seasonal influenza

("flu") vaccine, which vaccine is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the "Table"), 42 C.F.R.

§ 100.3 (a).

2. Petitioner received her flu vaccination on or about November 18, 2010.

3. The vaccine was administered within the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that the flu vaccine caused her to develop Transverse Myelitis

("TM") and that she experienced the residual effects of this injury for more than six months.

5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action

for damages as a result of her condition.

6. Respondent denies that the flu immunization is the cause of petitioner's alleged TM,

and/or any other injury. Case 1:12-vv-00879-UNJ Document 36 Filed 11/14/14 Page 2 of 5

7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the

issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the

compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent with

the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive compensation

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2l(a)(l), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue

the following vaccine compensation payment:

A lump sum of $100,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. §300aa-15(a).

9. As soon as practicable after the entry of judgment on entitlement in this case, and after

petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(l), and an application, the parties will submit to further proceedings before

the special master to award reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in proceeding upon this

petition.

10. Petitioner and her attorney represent that they have identified to respondent all

known sources of payment for items or services for which the Program is not primarily liable

under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa- 15(g), including State compensation programs, insurance policies,

Federal or State health benefits programs (other than Title XIX of the Social Security Act (42

U.S.C. § 1396 et seq.)), or by entities that provide health services on a pre-paid basis.

11. Payment made pursuant to paragraph 8 of this Stipulation, and any amount awarded

pursuant to paragraph 9 of this Stipulation, will be made in accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-

15(i), subject to the availability of sufficient statutory funds.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roberts v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2014).

Roberts v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Roberts v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa-
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-12
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4)(B)
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)
§ 300aa-21
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(l)
§ 300aa-2l
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2l(a)(l)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a