Roberts v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

CourtUnited States Court of Federal Claims
DecidedApril 28, 2014
Docket1:12-vv-00669
StatusUnpublished

This text of Roberts v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Roberts v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Federal Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roberts v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2014).

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 12-669V Filed: April 7, 2014

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * UNPUBLISHED GRAHAM ROBERTS, * * Special Master Dorsey Petitioner, * * Joint Stipulation on Damages; v. * Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Transverse * Myelitis (TM) SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Christina Ciampolillo, Conway, Homer & Chin-Caplan, PC, Boston, MA, for petitioner. Darryl Wishard, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION 1

On October 3, 2012, Graham Roberts (“petitioner”) filed a petition pursuant to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. 2 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006). The petition alleged that petitioner suffered a neurological demyelinating injury as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccination he received on October 13, 2009. Petition at 1-2. Petitioner later filed an amended petition in which he alleged that his vaccine-related injury was, in fact, transverse myelitis (TM). Amended Petition, filed April 8, 2013, at 1.

On April 7, 2014, the parties filed a stipulation, stating that a decision should be entered 1 Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the undersigned’s action in this case, the undersigned intends to post this ruling on the website of the United States Court of Federal Claims, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). As provided by Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14 days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). 2 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006) (Vaccine Act or the Act). All citations in this decision to individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa.

1 awarding compensation.

Respondent denies that the flu vaccine either caused or significantly aggravated petitioner’s TM or any other injury, and denies that petitioner experienced symptoms of TM or any other injury for more than six months. Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto as Appendix A. The undersigned finds the stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

The parties stipulated that petitioner shall receive the following compensation:

A lump sum of $77,176.41, in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

Stipulation ¶ 8.

The undersigned approves the requested amount for petitioner’s compensation. Accordingly, an award should be made consistent with the stipulation.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’ stipulation. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.

2 Case 1:12-vv-00669-UNJ Document 35 Filed 04/07/14 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

) GRAHAM ROBERTS, ) ) Petitioner, ) No. 12-669V ECF ) v. ) Special Master Dorsey ) SECRETARY OF HEALTH ) AND HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) ~~~~~~~~~~~~-)

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

I. Petitioner, Graham Roberts, filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 to 34 (the "Vaccine

Program"). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to petitioner's receipt

of the influenza ("flu") vaccine, which vaccine is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the

"Table"), 42 C.F.R. § 100.3(a).

2~ Petitioner received the flu ·vaccine on October 13, 2009.

3. The vaccine was administered within the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that, as a result ofreceiving the flu vaccine, he suffered from

transverse myelitis ("TM"), and that he experienced symptoms of TM for more than six months.

5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civjJ action

for damages as a result of these injuries.

6. Respondent denies that the flu vaccine either caused or significantly aggravated

I Case 1:12-vv-00669-UNJ Document 35 Filed 04/07/14 Page 2 of 5

petitioner's TM or any other injury, and denies that he experienced symptoms of TM or any other

injury for more than six months.

7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the

issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the

compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent

with the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive

compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2l(a)(l), the Secretary of Health and Human

Services will issue the following vaccine compensation payment:

A lump sum of $77,176.41, in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

9. As soon as practicable after the entry of judgment on entitlement in this case, and

after petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2l(a)(l), and an application, the parties will submit to further proceedings

before the special master to award reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in proceeding

upon this petition.

10. Petitioner and his attorney represent that compensation to be provided pursuant to

this Stipulation is not for any items or services for which the Program is not primarily liable

under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(g), to the extent that payment has been made or can reasonably be

expected to be made under any State compensation programs, insurance policies, Federal or

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-1
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-1
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)
§ 300aa-2l
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2l(a)(l)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Roberts v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-secretary-of-health-and-human-services-uscfc-2014.