Roberts v. Rowell

Supreme Court of Georgia

Roberts v. Rowell

108 S.E. 466, 152 Ga. 97, 1921 Ga. LEXIS 14

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided September 24, 1921·No. No. 2258·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

There being no bona fide effort to brief the evidence in the case, the so-called brief of evidence being largely composed of objections to evidence and the argument of counsel thereon, colloquies between counsel and between counsel and the court, and various statements of the court in ruling on the admissibility of evidence, such document will not be considered as a. brief of evidence. Accordingly, this court will not review the evidence; and as no question is presented by the bill of exceptions which can be intelligently considered and passed upon without. reference to the evidence, the judgment below must be affirmed. Bishop v. Brown, 138 Ga. 738 (75 S. E. 1119), and citations.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atkinson, J.

There being no bona fide effort to brief the evidence in the case, the so-called brief of evidence being largely composed of objections to evidence and the argument of counsel thereon, colloquies between counsel and between counsel and the court, and various statements of the court in ruling on the admissibility of evidence, such document will not be considered as a. brief of evidence. Accordingly, this court will not review the evidence; and as no question is presented by the bill of exceptions which can be intelligently considered and passed upon without. reference to the evidence, the judgment below must be affirmed. Bishop v. Brown, 138 Ga. 738 (75 S. E. 1119), and citations.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Roberts v. Rowell, 108 S.E. 466, 152 Ga. 97, 1921 Ga. LEXIS 14 (Ga. 1921).

Pincite

108 S.E. 466 (Roberts v. Rowell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related