Roberts v. Rowell
This text of 108 S.E. 466 (Roberts v. Rowell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There being no bona fide effort to brief the evidence in the case, the so-called brief of evidence being largely composed of objections to evidence and the argument of counsel thereon, colloquies between counsel and between counsel and the court, and various statements of the court in ruling on the admissibility of evidence, such document will not be considered as a. brief of evidence. Accordingly, this court will not review the evidence; and as no question is presented by the bill of exceptions which can be intelligently considered and passed upon without. reference to the evidence, the judgment below must be affirmed. Bishop v. Brown, 138 Ga. 738 (75 S. E. 1119), and citations.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
108 S.E. 466, 152 Ga. 97, 1921 Ga. LEXIS 14, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-rowell-ga-1921.