Richards v. Mabry

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Richards v. Mabry

148 S.E. 289, 39 Ga. App. 707, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 531

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 15, 1929

Docket19318

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 148 S.E. 289 (Richards v. Mabry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richards v. Mabry, 148 S.E. 289, 39 Ga. App. 707, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 531 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Bell, J.

There being no bona fide effort to brief the evidence in this case, the so-called brief of evidence being a mere stenographic report of what occurred upon the trial, including all questions propounded to and answered by witnesses, objections to evidence, and the various rulings of the court thereon, it will not be considered as a brief of evidence, and the evidence will not be reviewed by this court. Accordingly, since the writ of error presents no question that can be intelligently considered and passed upon without reference to the evidence, the judgment of the court below must be affirmed. Civil Code (1910), § 6093; Bishop v. Brown, 138 Ga. 738 (75 S. E. 1119) ; Roberts v. Rowell, 152 Ga. 97 (108 S. E. 466) ; Whitten v. Bacon, 165 Ga. 151 (140 S. E. 287); Jackson v. Dorsey, 26 Ga. App. 372 (4) (106 S. E. 210); O’Farrell v. Templeman, 39 Ga. App. 222 (146 S. E. 914).

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell, J.

There being no bona fide effort to brief the evidence in this case, the so-called brief of evidence being a mere stenographic report of what occurred upon the trial, including all questions propounded to and answered by witnesses, objections to evidence, and the various rulings of the court thereon, it will not be considered as a brief of evidence, and the evidence will not be reviewed by this court. Accordingly, since the writ of error presents no question that can be intelligently considered and passed upon without reference to the evidence, the judgment of the court below must be affirmed. Civil Code (1910), § 6093; Bishop v. Brown, 138 Ga. 738 (75 S. E. 1119) ; Roberts v. Rowell, 152 Ga. 97 (108 S. E. 466) ; Whitten v. Bacon, 165 Ga. 151 (140 S. E. 287); Jackson v. Dorsey, 26 Ga. App. 372 (4) (106 S. E. 210); O’Farrell v. Templeman, 39 Ga. App. 222 (146 S. E. 914).

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

148 S.E. 289, 39 Ga. App. 707, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richards-v-mabry-gactapp-1929.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack