O'Farrell v. Templeman

146 S.E. 914, 39 Ga. App. 222, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 264
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 22, 1929·No. 19096·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinions

Stephens, J.

It appearing that no bona fide effort has been made to brief the evidence in this case by reducing it to narrative form, as is required before this court can be called upon to consider the evidence, but what purports to be the brief of evidence being questions and answers, matter excluded from evidence, objections as to the admissibility of testimony, and rulings of the court thereon, and interpolations and colloquies by counsel, this court will not consider the evidence. Civil Code, § 6093 (1910); Roberts v. Rowell, 152 Ga. 97 (108 S. E. 466); Jackson v. Dorsey, 26 Ga. App. 372 (106 S. E. 210).

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Bell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O'Farrell v. Templeman, 146 S.E. 914, 39 Ga. App. 222, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 264 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).

146 S.E. 914 (O'Farrell v. Templeman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas v. Carroll
102 S.E.2d 617 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1958)
Crawfokd v. Cook
48 Ga. App. 456 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Green v. Thomas
151 S.E. 556 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Richards v. Mabry
148 S.E. 289 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)
Green v. Beaumont
147 S.E. 911 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)
Cooper v. Harris
147 S.E. 805 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)