O'Farrell v. Templeman
This text of 146 S.E. 914 (O'Farrell v. Templeman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
It appearing that no bona fide effort has been made to brief the evidence in this case by reducing it to narrative form, as is required before this court can be called upon to consider the evidence, but what purports to be the brief of evidence being questions and answers, matter excluded from evidence, objections as to the admissibility of testimony, and rulings of the court thereon, and interpolations and colloquies by counsel, this court will not consider the evidence. Civil Code, § 6093 (1910); Roberts v. Rowell, 152 Ga. 97 (108 S. E. 466); Jackson v. Dorsey, 26 Ga. App. 372 (106 S. E. 210).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
146 S.E. 914, 39 Ga. App. 222, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ofarrell-v-templeman-gactapp-1929.