Robert M. Eidson v. Robyn Croutch

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedAugust 10, 2015
DocketA15D0495
StatusPublished

This text of Robert M. Eidson v. Robyn Croutch (Robert M. Eidson v. Robyn Croutch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robert M. Eidson v. Robyn Croutch, (Ga. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ August 06, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15D0495. ROBERT M. EIDSON v. ROBYN CROUTCH et al.

Robyn Croutch, individually and as next friend of Madison Croutch (“Croutch”), sued Robert M. Eidson in Gwinnett County State Court. Eidson filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. After Eidson withdrew the motion to dismiss, the trial court awarded Croutch attorney fees under OCGA § 9-15-14 (a) based upon the absence of justiciable issues of law or fact in the motion to dismiss. Eidson seeks discretionary review of this ruling. Croutch, however, has filed a motion to dismiss. According to Croutch, we lack jurisdiction to entertain Eidson’s order. On the same day the trial court entered its order awarding attorney fees, it entered an order transferring the case to DeKalb County State Court. Thus, Croutch reasons, the case remains pending below. See Bailey v. Bailey, 266 Ga. 832 (471 SE2d 213) (1996) (compliance with the discretionary application procedure does not excuse a party seeking appellate review of an interlocutory order from complying with the additional requirements of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b)). Under OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (1), a litigant has a right to a direct appeal from a “final judgment[ ], that is to say, where the case is no longer pending in the court below.” There appears to be conflict in the case law regarding whether a transfer order leaves the case pending below with respect to the court issuing the transfer order. See Griffith v. Georgia Bd. of Dentistry, 175 Ga. App. 533 (333 SE2d 647) (1985) (transfer order interlocutory); J. T. M. v. State, 142 Ga. App. 635, 636 (1) (236 SE2d 764) (1977) (order transferring juvenile matter to superior court is final for purposes of filing direct appeal). Given this conflict in the case law - and the mandate that this Court liberally construe the Appellate Practice Act to bring about a decision on the merits - the motion to dismiss is hereby DENIED. See OCGA § 5-6-30. The application for discretionary appeal is GRANTED. Eidson may file a notice of appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of the State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals. The parties are directed to address the jurisdictional issue in their briefs to this Court.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 08/06/2015 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bailey v. Bailey
471 S.E.2d 213 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1996)
Griffith v. GEORGIA BOARD OF DENTISTRY
333 S.E.2d 647 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1985)
J. T. M. v. State
236 S.E.2d 764 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Robert M. Eidson v. Robyn Croutch, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-m-eidson-v-robyn-croutch-gactapp-2015.