Robert Hernandez, Sr.

CourtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut
DecidedJanuary 17, 2020
Docket18-51262
StatusUnknown

This text of Robert Hernandez, Sr. (Robert Hernandez, Sr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robert Hernandez, Sr., (Conn. 2020).

Opinion

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

____________________________________ IN RE: ) ) CASE No. 18-51262 (JAM) ROBERT HERNANDEZ, SR., ) ) CHAPTER 13 DEBTOR. ) ____________________________________) RE: ECF No. 60

Appearances

Roberta Napolitano Chapter 13 Trustee 10 Columbus Boulevard Hartford, CT 06106

Neil Crane Attorney for the Debtor Law Offices of Neil Crane 2679 Whitney Avenue Hamden, CT 06518

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER AUTHORIZING DISTRIBUTION OF FUNDS TO DEBTOR

Julie A. Manning, Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge I. Introduction On September 28, 2018, Robert Hernandez Sr. (the “Debtor”) filed a Chapter 13 petition. On January 16, 2019, the Debtor filed a First Amended Chapter 13 Plan (the “First Amended Plan”). In order to meet the obligations in the First Amended Plan, the Debtor proposed to make monthly payments of $717.00 directly to the Chapter 13 Trustee from his post-petition wages and/or income. The First Amended Plan was confirmed on January 18, 2019. On July 12, 2019, the Chapter 13 Trustee filed a Motion to Dismiss the Debtor’s case for Failure to Make Plan Payments. The Chapter 13’s Trustee’s Motion to Dismiss was granted on September 23, 2019. At the time the case was dismissed, the Chapter 13 Trustee held $717.00 in payments made by the Debtor to the Trustee (the “funds”) in accordance with the confirmed First Amended Plan. Although the case was dismissed, the Chapter 13 Trustee requested the Court retain jurisdiction of the case to allow her to file a memorandum addressing how the funds should be distributed. On December 4, 2019, the Chapter 13 Trustee filed a Memorandum for Order Authorizing Refund of Funds to Debtor. ECF No. 60. II. Discussion

Upon the filing of a Chapter 13 petition, a bankruptcy estate is created. 11 U.S.C. § 541(a). Included in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy estate are, in addition to the property specified in section 541, (1) all property of the kind specified in such section that the debtor acquires after the commencement of the case but before the case is closed, dismissed, or converted to a case under chapter 7, 11, or 12 of this title, whichever occurs first; and (2) earnings from services performed by the debtor after the commencement of the case but before the case is closed, dismissed, or converted to a case under chapter 7, 11, or 12 of this title, whichever occurs first.

11 U.S.C. § 1306(a) (emphasis added). Therefore, “[t]he filing of a Chapter 13 petition creates an estate consisting of all of the debtor’s legal and equitable interests in property at the time of the filing of the case and those acquired by the debtor after the filing (with some exceptions that are not relevant here), including a debtor’s earnings.” Williams v. Marshall, 526 B.R. 695, 698- 99 (N.D. Ill. 2014). In most Chapter 13 cases, a debtor’s post-petition earnings or wages fund the Chapter 13 plan. When a Chapter 13 plan is confirmed, section 1327(b) states “[e]xcept as otherwise provided in the plan or the order confirming the plan, the confirmation of a plan vests all of the property of the estate in the debtor.” 11 U.S.C. § 1327(b) (emphasis added). This means that when a debtor “transfers funds to the Chapter 13 trustee to fulfill [his] obligations under a confirmed plan …, the funds become part of the estate, and the debtor retains a vested interest in them. Though creditors have a right to those payments based on the confirmed plan, the debtor does not lose his vested interest [in the funds] until the trustee affirmatively transfers the funds to creditors.” In re Michael, 699 F.3d 305, 313 (3d Cir. 2012). The United States Supreme Court has also recognized that “‘no provision in the Bankruptcy Code classifies any property, including post-petition wages, as belonging to creditors.’” Harris v. Viegelahn, 575 U.S. 510, 135 S. Ct.

1829, 1839, 191 L. Ed. 2d 783 (2015) (quoting Michael, 699 F.3d at 312-313). The vesting language in section 1327(b) is clear—unless the plan or order confirming the plan provides otherwise, all property of the estate is vested in the debtor. The Connecticut Local Form Chapter 13 Plan unambiguously1 provides as follows: “Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1327(b), property of the estate will vest in the Debtor upon the entry of an Order Confirming this Chapter 13 Plan.”2 In this case, as will be true in virtually all Chapter 13 plans confirmed by this Court, the property of the estate vested in the Debtor upon confirmation of the First Amended Plan pursuant to section 1327(b), the terms of the First Amended Plan, and the Order Confirming the First Amended Plan.

The Chapter 13 Trustee points to conflicting law on the question of how funds that have not been transferred to creditors under a confirmed Chapter 13 plan should be distributed when the case is later dismissed. The Chapter 13 Trustee, as well as several cases to which she cites and which the Court has carefully reviewed, suggests section 349(b)(3) is the answer to the question. Section 349(b)(3) provides that “[u]nless the court, for cause, orders otherwise, a

1 In fact, this provision in the Connecticut Local Form Chapter 13 Plan appears in bold and in all capital letters. 2 While the Connecticut Local Form Chapter 13 Plan cannot be modified by a debtor, it may contain non-standard provisions. If a debtor’s plan provides that property of the estate will not vest in the debtor pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1327(b), the plan must clearly do so and such provision must be set forth in Section VII of the Connecticut Local Form Chapter 13 Plan or it is void. dismissal of a case other than under section 742 of this title—(3) revests the property of the estate in the entity in which such property was vested immediately before the commencement of the case under this title.” The Court finds it is not necessary to turn to section 349(b)(3) because section 1327(b) establishes that the funds vested with the Debtor when the First Amended Plan was confirmed.

The cases that rely on section 349(b)(3) to establish a trustee’s authority to distribute funds to a debtor in a confirmed but subsequently dismissed Chapter 13 case have not directly addressed the vesting language in section 1327(b). While it is true that section 1327(b) does not explicitly provide that undistributed funds should be returned to a debtor upon dismissal, neither does the language in section 349(b)(3). What each of those sections do provide is when and in whom property of the estate vests. Section 1327(b) applies only when a Chapter 13 plan is confirmed. Section 349(b)(3) applies when a case filed under any chapter of the Bankruptcy Code is dismissed, and “revests” property of the estate in the entity in which the property was vested before the bankruptcy case was filed. Because property of the estate has already vested in

a debtor upon confirmation pursuant to section 1327(b), there is no property to revest in the debtor or “in the entity in which such property was vested before the commencement of the case under this title” pursuant to section 349(b)(3). Therefore, there is no question that the funds must be returned to the Debtor. Any other outcome would not be sensible.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re: Barry L. Michael v.
699 F.3d 305 (Third Circuit, 2012)
In Re Slaughter
141 B.R. 661 (N.D. Illinois, 1992)
Harris v. Viegelahn
575 U.S. 510 (Supreme Court, 2015)
Williams v. Marshall
526 B.R. 695 (N.D. Illinois, 2014)
In re Hamilton
493 B.R. 31 (M.D. Tennessee, 2013)
In re Edwards
538 B.R. 536 (S.D. Illinois, 2015)
In re Demery
570 B.R. 220 (W.D. Louisiana, 2017)
In re Elms
603 B.R. 11 (S.D. Ohio, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Robert Hernandez, Sr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-hernandez-sr-ctb-2020.