FEDERAL · 11 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER II—THE PLAN
Effect of confirmation
11 U.S.C. § 1327
Title11 — Bankruptcy
ChapterSUBCHAPTER II—THE PLAN
This text of 11 U.S.C. § 1327 (Effect of confirmation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
11 U.S.C. § 1327.
Text
(a)The provisions of a confirmed plan bind the debtor and each creditor, whether or not the claim of such creditor is provided for by the plan, and whether or not such creditor has objected to, has accepted, or has rejected the plan.
(b)Except as otherwise provided in the plan or the order confirming the plan, the confirmation of a plan vests all of the property of the estate in the debtor.
(c)Except as otherwise provided in the plan or in the order confirming the plan, the property vesting in the debtor under subsection (b) of this section is free and clear of any claim or interest of any creditor provided for by the plan.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Barbosa v. Solomon
235 F.3d 31 (First Circuit, 2000)
In re Penrod
50 F.3d 459 (Seventh Circuit, 1995)
Max v. Northington (In Re Northington)
876 F.3d 1302 (Eleventh Circuit, 2017)
Whelton v. Educational Credit Management Corp.
432 F.3d 150 (Second Circuit, 2005)
Educational Credit Management Corp. v. Mersmann (In Re Mersmann)
505 F.3d 1033 (Tenth Circuit, 2007)
Matter Of Steenes
918 F.3d 554 (Seventh Circuit, 2019)
Burnett v. Burnett (In Re Burnett)
646 F.3d 575 (Eighth Circuit, 2011)
Enewally v. Washington Mutual Bank (In re Enewally)
368 F.3d 1165 (Ninth Circuit, 2004)
Rodriguez v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. (In re Rodriguez)
517 B.R. 724 (S.D. Texas, 2014)
In re Anderson
545 B.R. 174 (N.D. Mississippi, 2015)
Evans v. Stackhouse
564 B.R. 513 (E.D. Virginia, 2017)
In re Bell
476 B.R. 168 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2012)
Olick v. Northampton County (In re Olick)
517 B.R. 549 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2014)
Huwang v. Hillside Township
21 N.J. Tax 496 (New Jersey Tax Court, 2004)
Waterfield Mortgage Co. v. Clark (In Re Clark)
31 B.R. 502 (S.D. Ohio, 1983)
In re Shank
569 B.R. 238 (S.D. Texas, 2017)
In re Loden
572 B.R. 211 (W.D. Arkansas, 2017)
Fort v. State of Florida Department of Revenue
412 B.R. 840 (W.D. Virginia, 2009)
In re Hrubec
544 B.R. 397 (N.D. Illinois, 2016)
Countrywide Home Loans v. Davis (In Re Davis)
188 F. App'x 671 (Tenth Circuit, 2006)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 95–598, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2650.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
senate report no. 95–989
Subsection (a) binds the debtor and each creditor to the provisions of a confirmed plan, whether or not the claim of the creditor is provided for by the plan and whether or not the creditor has accepted, rejected, or objected to the plan. Unless the plan itself or the order confirming the plan otherwise provides, confirmation is deemed to vest all property of the estate in the debtor, free and clear of any claim or interest of any creditor provided for by the plan.
senate report no. 95–989
Subsection (a) binds the debtor and each creditor to the provisions of a confirmed plan, whether or not the claim of the creditor is provided for by the plan and whether or not the creditor has accepted, rejected, or objected to the plan. Unless the plan itself or the order confirming the plan otherwise provides, confirmation is deemed to vest all property of the estate in the debtor, free and clear of any claim or interest of any creditor provided for by the plan.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
11 U.S.C. § 1327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/11/1327.