Robert Granoff Corp. v. United First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Sarasota

424 So. 2d 199, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 21547
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 5, 1983·No. No. 82-1458·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

ORFINGER, Chief Judge.

Appellee/Cross Appellant moves to dismiss this appeal on the ground that it is taken from a non-appealable, non-final order. The order appealed from finally dismissed three counts of a five-count complaint. The remaining counts refer to another defendant and do not involve McCau-ghan. By dismissing the counts in question here, defendant McCaughan Mortgage Company is dismissed from the action, so as to McCaughan, the order appealed from is final and appealable. See Niesz v.6R.P. Morgan Building Company, Inc., 401 So.2d 822 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); Atlantic National Bank of Jacksonville v. Modular Age, Inc., 363 So.2d 1152 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). Cf. One Thousand Oaks, Inc., v. Dade Savings & Loan Association, 417 So.2d 1135 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).

Motion to dismiss is DENIED.

DAUKSCH and COBB, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robert Granoff Corp. v. United First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Sarasota, 424 So. 2d 199, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 21547 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

424 So. 2d 199 (Robert Granoff Corp. v. United First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Sarasota) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pierrot v. Osceola Mental Health, Inc.
106 So. 3d 491 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Aagaard-Juergensen, Inc. v. Lettelier
540 So. 2d 224 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)