Robert C. Lane v. United States of America, Robert C. Lane and Dorothy S. Lane v. United States

328 F.2d 602
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 21, 1964
Docket20545
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 328 F.2d 602 (Robert C. Lane v. United States of America, Robert C. Lane and Dorothy S. Lane v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robert C. Lane v. United States of America, Robert C. Lane and Dorothy S. Lane v. United States, 328 F.2d 602 (5th Cir. 1964).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is the second appeal in connection with these taxpayers’ effort to prevent the collection of taxes in excess of the sum agreed to in an accepted offer in compromise. The case was reported on its last appearance here at 303 F.2d 1. We decided then that when taxpayer breached his compromise agreement, under the terms of the agreement the Government was permitted to collect the full amount of the original tax claim, with credit being given for sums paid under the offer in compromise.

On the second trial the United States offered proof of the amount of the unpaid taxes and there was no counter proof. The trial court was therefore justified, in fact required, to enter a summary judgment for the Government for the amount of the taxes proved to be due. All other questions sought to be raised by the taxpayers on the second trial had been foreclosed by our disposition of the case on the first appeal.

The trial court also correctly dismissed the separate injunction suit in light of our earlier decision.

Judgments affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Howe
D. Idaho, 2023
Demeter International, Inc. v. Secretario De Hacienda
2018 TSPR 21 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 2018)
United States v. Neal
255 F.R.D. 638 (W.D. Arkansas, 2008)
Marathon Oil Co. v. United States
42 Fed. Cl. 267 (Federal Claims, 1998)
United States v. Klimek
952 F. Supp. 1100 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1997)
United States v. Dixon
672 F. Supp. 503 (M.D. Alabama, 1987)
United States v. Powell
494 F. Supp. 260 (S.D. Georgia, 1980)
United States v. Saladoff
233 F. Supp. 255 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
328 F.2d 602, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-c-lane-v-united-states-of-america-robert-c-lane-and-dorothy-s-ca5-1964.