Roberson v. State

500 So. 2d 565, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2451, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10728
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 19, 1986·No. No. 85-2549·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

LEHAN, Judge.

We affirm defendant’s convictions for trafficking, and conspiracy to traffic, in more than 400 grams of cocaine and for possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony. The trial court did not err in denying defendant’s motion to dismiss which asserted entrapment. The alleged entrapment arose from an undercover police officer’s communications, arranged by an informant, with a codefendant. None of such communications were with defendant whose first contact with the officer was during the actual consummation of the drug transaction on which the convictions were based. See United States v. Mers, 701 F.2d 1321 (11th Cir.1983).

DANAHY, C.J., and FRANK, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roberson v. State, 500 So. 2d 565, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2451, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10728 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

500 So. 2d 565 (Roberson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Neff v. State
570 So. 2d 1109 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)