Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Roberson v. State

Roberson v. State

517 So. 2d 99, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 93, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11701, 1987 WL 3187
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 22, 1987
DocketNo. BR-217
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 517 So. 2d 99 (Roberson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roberson v. State, 517 So. 2d 99, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 93, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11701, 1987 WL 3187 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

BARFIELD, Judge.

The conviction and sentence on Count III are vacated. The facts establish that appellant’s conduct constituted one continuous sexual battery. The situation is therefore distinguishable from that found in Grunzel v. State, 484 So.2d 97 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), in which the defendant committed two separate acts that violated the sexual battery statute. The other issues on appeal are without merit. The remaining convictions and the sentences are AFFIRMED.

ERVIN and JOANOS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Saavedra v. State
576 So. 2d 953 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
City of Miami v. Barragan
517 So. 2d 99 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
517 So. 2d 99, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 93, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11701, 1987 WL 3187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberson-v-state-fladistctapp-1987.