Roberson v. State

457 So. 2d 1135, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2212, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15596
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 17, 1984
DocketNo. 83-2027
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 457 So. 2d 1135 (Roberson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roberson v. State, 457 So. 2d 1135, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2212, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15596 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order revoking defendant’s probation because the trial court failed to advise him of his right to counsel.1 See Hicks v. State, 452 So.2d 606 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). The court also erred by imposing a sentence of 4 years, 3 months and 21 days. This sentence exceeds the four-year cap on terms of incarceration for defendants designated as youthful offenders. Brandle v. State, 406 So.2d 1221 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). Additionally the court erred by refusing to grant credit for the 513 days [1136]*1136which the defendant served in prison on the split sentence prior to his release on probation in July, 1983. See Villery v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission, 396 So.2d 1107 (Fla.1980).

Accordingly, the order of revocation is reversed, the sentence is vacated and the cause remanded with directions to hold a revocation proceeding at which the defendant is advised of his right to counsel.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

HURLEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur. GLICKSTEIN, J., concurs in result only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pendergrass v. State
487 So. 2d 35 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
457 So. 2d 1135, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2212, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15596, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberson-v-state-fladistctapp-1984.