R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Clayton

193 So. 3d 1088, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9388, 2016 WL 3385237
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 17, 2016
DocketNo. 1D14-3946
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 193 So. 3d 1088 (R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Clayton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Clayton, 193 So. 3d 1088, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9388, 2016 WL 3385237 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT

PER CURIAM.

This matter is before us on remand from the Florida Supreme Court following its decision in Sojfer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, 187 So.3d 1219 (Fla.2016). In compliance with the Florida Supreme Court’s directive, we remand this case for further proceedings on the issue of whether punitive damages should be imposed for Appellee/Cross-Appellant’s negligence and strict liability claims and, if so, the amount thereof.

REVERSED and REMANDED with instructions.

LEWIS, WETHERELL, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blundell v. Philip Morris USA Inc.
197 So. 3d 1289 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
193 So. 3d 1088, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9388, 2016 WL 3385237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rj-reynolds-tobacco-co-v-clayton-fladistctapp-2016.