R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Clayton
193 So. 3d 1088, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9388, 2016 WL 3385237
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 17, 2016·No. No. 1D14-3946·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
ON REMAND FROM THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT
This matter is before us on remand from the Florida Supreme Court following its decision in Sojfer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, 187 So.3d 1219 (Fla.2016). In compliance with the Florida Supreme Court’s directive, we remand this case for further proceedings on the issue of whether punitive damages should be imposed for Appellee/Cross-Appellant’s negligence and strict liability claims and, if so, the amount thereof.
REVERSED and REMANDED with instructions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Clayton, 193 So. 3d 1088, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9388, 2016 WL 3385237 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).
193 So. 3d 1088 (R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Clayton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Blundell v. Philip Morris USA Inc.
197 So. 3d 1289 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Teresa Starr Blundell, as Per. Rep. etc. v. Philip Morris USA Inc. and R.J. Reynolds etc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016