Blundell v. Philip Morris USA Inc.

197 So. 3d 1289, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 13349, 2016 WL 4607995
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 6, 2016·No. No. 1D13-6004·Published

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT

PER CURIAM.

On direct appeal, we affirmed the trial court’s conclusion that “Engle1 class members are prohibited from recovering punitive damages on negligence and strict liability claims” based on Soffer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 106 So.3d 456, 457 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012), which has since been quashed on that point of law. As such, we remand for reconsideration in light of Soffer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco, Co., 187 So.3d 1219 (Fla.2016). See R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Clayton, 193 So.3d 1088 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016).

REVERSED and REMANDED with instructions.

MAKAR, WINOKUR and WINSOR, JJ., concur.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blundell v. Philip Morris USA Inc., 197 So. 3d 1289, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 13349, 2016 WL 4607995 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

197 So. 3d 1289 (Blundell v. Philip Morris USA Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Engle v. Liggett Group, Inc.
945 So. 2d 1246 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2006)
Lucille Ruth Soffer, etc. v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company
187 So. 3d 1219 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2016)
Soffer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.
106 So. 3d 456 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Clayton
193 So. 3d 1088 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)