Ritter v. McNeil

41 So. 3d 366, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 10696, 2010 WL 2873592
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 23, 2010
Docket1D10-2828
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 41 So. 3d 366 (Ritter v. McNeil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ritter v. McNeil, 41 So. 3d 366, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 10696, 2010 WL 2873592 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied as premature. See Rodriguez v. State, 21 So.3d 826 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (table) (denying a petition for writ of mandamus as premature where petitioner’s last pleading was delivered to the trial court less than 60 days before).

HAWKES, C.J., and LEWIS, J., concur. BENTON J., would issue an order to show cause.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Howe v. State
187 So. 3d 394 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Daniel P. Howe v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
41 So. 3d 366, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 10696, 2010 WL 2873592, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ritter-v-mcneil-fladistctapp-2010.