Ritter v. McNeil

41 So. 3d 366, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 10696, 2010 WL 2873592
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 23, 2010·No. 1D10-2828·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied as premature. See Rodriguez v. State, 21 So.3d 826 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (table) (denying a petition for writ of mandamus as premature where petitioner’s last pleading was delivered to the trial court less than 60 days before).

HAWKES, C.J., and LEWIS, J., concur. BENTON J., would issue an order to show cause.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ritter v. McNeil, 41 So. 3d 366, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 10696, 2010 WL 2873592 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

41 So. 3d 366 (Ritter v. McNeil) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Howe v. State
187 So. 3d 394 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Daniel P. Howe v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016