Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Howe v. State

Howe v. State

187 So. 3d 394, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4382, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 726
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 21, 2016
DocketNo. 1D16-0797
StatusPublished

This text of 187 So. 3d 394 (Howe v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Howe v. State, 187 So. 3d 394, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4382, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 726 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied as premature. See Ritter v. McNeil, 41 So.3d 366 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).

LEWIS, SWANSON, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ritter v. McNeil
41 So. 3d 366 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
187 So. 3d 394, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4382, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 726, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howe-v-state-fladistctapp-2016.