Daniel P. Howe v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Daniel P. Howe v. State of Florida

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 20, 2016

Docket16-0797

StatusPublished

This text of Daniel P. Howe v. State of Florida (Daniel P. Howe v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Daniel P. Howe v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

DANIEL P. HOWE, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Petitioner, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D16-0797

STATE OF FLORIDA, et al.,

Respondent. ___________________________/

Opinion filed March 21, 2016.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus -- Original Jurisdiction.

Daniel P. Howe, pro se, for Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied as premature. See Ritter v. McNeil,

41 So. 3d 366 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010). LEWIS, SWANSON, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI