Riley v. State

320 S.W.3d 739, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1252, 2010 WL 3681555
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 21, 2010·No. ED 93992·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Reginald Riley, appeals the motion court’s order denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 24.035 motion for postcon-viction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Riley v. State, 320 S.W.3d 739, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1252, 2010 WL 3681555 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

320 S.W.3d 739 (Riley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chambers v. State
320 S.W.3d 739 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)