Chambers v. State

320 S.W.3d 739, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1253, 2010 WL 3681548
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 21, 2010·No. ED 93994·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gregory Chambers (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 29.15 without an evidentia-ry hearing. Movant contends that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion for post-conviction relief.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chambers v. State, 320 S.W.3d 739, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1253, 2010 WL 3681548 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

320 S.W.3d 739 (Chambers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Riley v. State
320 S.W.3d 739 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)