Riley v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Riley v. State

292 S.W.3d 351, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 786, 2009 WL 1586018

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 9, 2009

DocketWD 69685

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 292 S.W.3d 351 (Riley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Riley v. State, 292 S.W.3d 351, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 786, 2009 WL 1586018 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Riley appeals the circuit court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief based on ineffective assistance of trial counsel. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion; however a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Riley appeals the circuit court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief based on ineffective assistance of trial counsel. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion; however a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

292 S.W.3d 351, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 786, 2009 WL 1586018, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riley-v-state-moctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack