Riley Stoker Corp. v. Commissioner

26 B.T.A. 749, 1932 BTA LEXIS 1253
CourtUnited States Board of Tax Appeals
DecidedJuly 29, 1932
DocketDocket No. 36584.
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 26 B.T.A. 749 (Riley Stoker Corp. v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Riley Stoker Corp. v. Commissioner, 26 B.T.A. 749, 1932 BTA LEXIS 1253 (bta 1932).

Opinion

opinion.

Goodkich:

Petitioner assails respondent’s determination of a deficiency in its income-tax liability for the year 1923 in the amount of $5,451.74, and contends that it has already overpaid that liability and is entitled to a refund. In general, there is at issue here the proper application to 1923 income, under section 204, Revenue Act of 1921, of net losses sustained by certain members of a group of affiliated corporations in the years 1921 and 1922. Specifically, petitioner complains that respondent has treated as a “ taxable year ” each of the two periods of the calendar year in which affiliation occurred, prior and subsequent to the date of affiliation, thus barring from application to the year 1923 certain of the net losses which, under the statute, may be carried forward two succeeding taxable years. It further complains specifically of respondent’s failure to offset against income earned in 1923 by certain of the corporations during affiliation the net losses sustained by the same corporations prior to affiliation. After this case was submitted, the Supreme Court handed down its decisions in the cases of Woolford Realty [750]*750Co. v. Rose, 286 U. S. 319, and Planters Cotton Oil Co. v. Hopkins, 286 U. S. 332. In view of the fact that the principles announced in those decisions must guide us in the determination of this proceeding, opportunity was afforded to both parties, and availed of, to submit further argument in this case in the light of those decisions, with the result that petitioner’s claims as to the amounts of net losses applicable to 1923 income have been modified substantially.

The facts, as admitted by the pleadings and stipulated by the parties, are as follows:

Tlie petitioner is a Massachusetts corporation with its principal office at Worcester, Massachusetts. Its name was changed from Sanford Riley Stoker Company to Riley Stoker Corporation on December 27, 1924. Dor the entire calendar year 1923 the Sanford Riley Stoker Company, Murphy Iron Works (Inc.), Underfeed Stoker Company of America, Craig Damper Regulator Company, and A. W. Cash Company were affiliated. The net income or loss of each of these corporations and their affiliated net income for the calendar year 1923 as determined by the Commissioner, without allowing net loss prior to January 1, 1923, is as follows:
Net Incomes
Sanford Riley Stoker Corporation-$157,135. 01
Underfeed Stoker Co. of America- 163, 616.30
Craig Damper Regulator Company_ 454.49
A. W. Cash Company_ 18, 960.89
Total aggregate net income-$340,166. 69
Loss
Murphy Iron Works (Inc.)_ 3,165.82
Consolidated net income, 1923_$337, 000. 87
The following corporations were affiliated with each other for the calendar year 1922 from the date set respectively after each name to December 31, 1922:
Sanford Riley Stoker Company from January 1, 1922.
Murphy Iron Works (Inc.) from January 1, 1922.
Underfeed Stoker Co. of America from June 12, 1922.
A. W. Cash Company from August 31, 1922.
Craig Damper Regulator Company from June 12, 1922.
• A consolidated return was filed for the calendar year 1922 including the above named companies.
The net income or net loss of each corporation from the date indicated to December 31, 1922, and the consolidated net income for the year 1922 (as finally determined by the Commissioner) were as follows:
Net Incomes
Sanford Riley Stoker Co. (from January 1, 1922)_ $17,276.77
Murphy Iron Works (Inc.) (from January 1, 1922)_ 87,377.16
A. W. Cash Company (from August 31, 1922)_$3,102. 57
A. W. Cash Company (1921 Net Loss $38,739.45 offset)-- None.
Aggregate Net Income. $104, 653. 93
[751]*751 Net Losses
Underfeed Stoker Co. of America (from June 12, 1922) _ $6,298.34
Craig Damper Regulator Co. (from June 12, 1922)_ 10.26
Aggregate Net Losses_ $6,308.60
Consolidated Net Income, 1922_ $98,345. 33
The following corporations were affiliated with each other but not with any other corporation from January 1, 1922 to June 11, 1922:
Craig Damper Regulator Company and Underfeed Stoker Co. of America.
A consolidated return was filed covering this period in 1922 including the above named companies.
The net loss resulting from the operation of the business regularly carried on by each corporation, after making adjustment for non-taxablo interest and dividends received and for unallowable deductions, and after intercompany adjustments, for the period from January 1, 1922, to June 11, 1922, were as follows:
Net Losses
Craig Damper Regulator Co_ $8.19
Underfeed Stoker Co. of America-4, 581.33
The A. W. Cash Company was not affiliated with any other corporation for the period from January 1, 1922, to August 30, 1922. The net income of the said corporation for the said period in 1922 was $6,104.18.
The following corporations were affiliated with each other but not with any other corporation for the entire calendar year 1921:
Craig Damper Regulator Company and Underfeed Stoker Co. of America.
The net loss resulting from the operation of the business regularly carried on by each corporation, after making adjustment for nontaxable interest and dividends received and for unallowable deductions, and after intercompany adjustments, for the calendar year 1921 were as follows:
Net Losses
Craig Damper Regulator Company-$3, 587. 42
Underfeed Stoker Co. of America- 103,972. 30
The A. W. Cash Company was not affiliated with any other corporation for the calendar year 1921. The net loss resulting from the operation of the business regularly carried on by the A. W. Cash Company, after making adjustment for non-taxable interest and dividends received and for unallowable deductions, for the calendar year 1921, was $38,739.45.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Frelbro Corp. v. Commissioner
36 T.C. 864 (U.S. Tax Court, 1961)
W. M. Ritter Lumber Co. v. Commissioner
30 B.T.A. 231 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1934)
Wolverine Petroleum Corp. v. Commissioner
29 B.T.A. 1236 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1934)
Albert Leon & Son, Inc. v. Commissioner
29 B.T.A. 251 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1933)
Riley Stoker Corp. v. Commissioner
26 B.T.A. 749 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 B.T.A. 749, 1932 BTA LEXIS 1253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riley-stoker-corp-v-commissioner-bta-1932.