Richmond Unified School District v. Berg

434 U.S. 158, 98 S. Ct. 623, 54 L. Ed. 2d 375, 1977 U.S. LEXIS 160, 15 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 7949, 16 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 145

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 6, 1977·No. 75-1069·Published·Cited by 38 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals, 528 P. 2d 1208, is vacated and the cause remanded for further consideration in light of General Electric Co. v. Gilbert, 429 U. S. 125 (1976), and Nashville Gas Co. v. Satty, ante, p. 136, and for consideration of possible mootness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richmond Unified School District v. Berg, 434 U.S. 158, 98 S. Ct. 623, 54 L. Ed. 2d 375, 1977 U.S. LEXIS 160, 15 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 7949, 16 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 145 (1977).

Pincite

434 U.S. 158 (Richmond Unified School District v. Berg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

D. Alaska, 2026

Woodruff v. Caris MPI

Fifth Circuit, 2022

O'Hailpin v. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc.

D. Hawaii, 2022

Miller v. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co.

202 F.R.D. 195 (D. Maryland, 2001)

Salfingere v. Latex

971 F. Supp. 1308 (D. Arizona, 1997)

Dawson v. Superior Court

786 P.2d 1074 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1990)

Alva Gutierrez v. Municipal Court of the Southeast Judicial District, County of Los Angeles, Incorrectly Sued as "County of Los Angeles, a Public Entity Porter De Dubovay John W. Bunnett and Russell F. Schooling, in Their Capacity as Officials Having Authority to Issue Personnel Rules for Employees of the County of Los Angeles at the Municipal Court of the Southeast Judicial District," Alva Gutierrez v. Porter De Dubovay John W. Bunnett and Russell F. Schooling, Defendants

838 F.2d 1031 (Ninth Circuit, 1988)

Gutierrez v. Municipal Court of the Southeast Judicial District

838 F.2d 1031 (Ninth Circuit, 1988)

Charles E. Wagner v. Reese H. Taylor, Jr., Chairman, Interstate Commerce Commission

836 F.2d 566 (D.C. Circuit, 1987)

35 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1707, 35 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 34,671 Vivian B. Gooding v. Warner-Lambert Company, Albert H. Graddis and Betty K. Adams, for Robert R. Adams

744 F.2d 354 (Third Circuit, 1984)

Gooding v. Warner-Lambert Co.

744 F.2d 354 (Third Circuit, 1984)

Cecil O. BAILEY, Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. DELTA AIR LINES, INC., Defendant, Appellee

722 F.2d 942 (First Circuit, 1983)

Irizarry v. New York City Housing Authority

575 F. Supp. 571 (S.D. New York, 1983)

30 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1059, 30 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,273 Charla Duke v. Emory Langdon, as Regional Counsel, Western Region, Office of the Chief Counsel, Internal Revenue Service, Department of the Treasury, United States of America, James Booher, Lamont Olsen, John E. Lahart, Jr.

695 F.2d 1136 (Ninth Circuit, 1983)

Guerrero v. Reeves Bros.

562 F. Supp. 603 (W.D. North Carolina, 1983)

Duke v. Langdon

695 F.2d 1136 (Ninth Circuit, 1983)

Pollard v. City of Hartford

539 F. Supp. 1156 (D. Connecticut, 1982)

Cassidy v. Virginia Carolina Veneer Corp.

538 F. Supp. 651 (W.D. Virginia, 1982)

Patricia SHEEHAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PUROLATOR COURIER CORPORATION and Purolator, Inc., Defendants-Appellees

676 F.2d 877 (Second Circuit, 1982)

Grogg v. General Motors Corp.

529 F. Supp. 293 (S.D. New York, 1981)