Richardson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Richardson v. State

284 S.W.3d 773, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 798, 2009 WL 1586015

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 9, 2009·No. WD 69413·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Jackie E. Richardson appeals the circuit court’s order denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief in which he sought to have the judgment of his possession of a controlled substance with the intent to distribute conviction vacated. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Jackie E. Richardson appeals the circuit court’s order denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief in which he sought to have the judgment of his possession of a controlled substance with the intent to distribute conviction vacated. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Richardson v. State, 284 S.W.3d 773, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 798, 2009 WL 1586015 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

284 S.W.3d 773 (Richardson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related