Richardson v. State
325 S.W.3d 553, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1614, 2010 WL 4823476
Opinion
ORDER
James Richardson appeals from the Circuit Court of Chariton County’s denial of his motion to reopen his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Richardson v. State, 325 S.W.3d 553, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1614, 2010 WL 4823476 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).
325 S.W.3d 553 (Richardson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Orr v. Lombardi
325 S.W.3d 553 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)