State v. Hatten
284 S.W.3d 773, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 799, 2009 WL 1586008
Opinion
*774 ORDER
Mark Hatten appeals his conviction for armed criminal action, § 571.015. He argues that the evidence was insufficient to show that he acted with the required intent for armed criminal action. After a thorough review of the record, we find that the conviction is supported by substantial evidence. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion; however, a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Hatten, 284 S.W.3d 773, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 799, 2009 WL 1586008 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
284 S.W.3d 773 (State v. Hatten) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Richardson v. State
284 S.W.3d 773 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)