Richardson v. State

765 So. 2d 881, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10648, 2000 WL 1162007
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Richardson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 719 So. 2d 39
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 18, 2000·No. No. 2D99-3204·Published

Opinion

SALCINES, Judge.

Edward L. Richardson appeals his sentences for solicitation to commit prostitution. We reverse the amended sentencing order which specifies a period of restraint which exceeds the lawful sentence for such a misdemeanor and remand this matter to the trial court for further proceedings.

Mr. Richardson was sentenced to two concurrent one-year sentences of' probation with time served in county jail as a condition of probation. By order, this court relinquished jurisdiction to the trial court for the entry of a proper sentencing order explaining whether the time served was intended to be credited against the one-year terms of probation. The resulting amended sentencing order stated that “[i]t is the intent of this court that credit for time served is not to be applied to the Defendant’s term of probation.” These were clearly unlawful sentences as stated in Richardson v. State, 761 So.2d 1232 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). However, because it is unclear whether Mr. Richardson is currently serving any portion of his sentences, we must remand this matter to the trial court for the determination of whether this issue is moot and, if not, for resentencing within the appropriate lawful limit for these misdemeanors.

Reversed and remanded.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and PARKER, J., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richardson v. State, 765 So. 2d 881, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10648, 2000 WL 1162007 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

765 So. 2d 881 (Richardson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Richardson v. State
761 So. 2d 1232 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)