Richardson v. Heydenfeldt

California Supreme Court

Richardson v. Heydenfeldt

46 Cal. 68

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1873

DocketNo. 3,722

StatusPublished

Cited by13 cases

This text of 46 Cal. 68 (Richardson v. Heydenfeldt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richardson v. Heydenfeldt, 46 Cal. 68 (Cal. 1873).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court:

The description of the work to be performed is “constructing sidewalks on Broadway street from the westerly line of Van Ness Avenue to the easterly line of Octavia [70]*70street, where necessary. ” It is indispensable that the work to be done should be determined by the judgment of the Board, and neither the judgment of the Superintendent nor that of any other person can be substituted. The case, in this respect, is plainly distinguishable from a resolution of intention to order work to be done “except where done.”

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court:

The description of the work to be performed is “constructing sidewalks on Broadway street from the westerly line of Van Ness Avenue to the easterly line of Octavia [70]*70street, where necessary. ” It is indispensable that the work to be done should be determined by the judgment of the Board, and neither the judgment of the Superintendent nor that of any other person can be substituted. The case, in this respect, is plainly distinguishable from a resolution of intention to order work to be done “except where done.”

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

46 Cal. 68, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richardson-v-heydenfeldt-cal-1873.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack