People v. Ladd

California Supreme Court

People v. Ladd

47 Cal. 603

California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1874·No. No. 4,083·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

By the Court:

The resolution of intention, upon which the assessment is founded, was, among other things, that Folsom Street, from First to Second, be repaired “ where necessary,” and that “ curbs and sidewalks thereon be reconstructed where necessary,” etc. Upon the authority of Richardson v. Heydenfeldt, 46 Cal. 68, and People v. Clark, ante, 456, the judgment and order denying a new trial are affirmed. Remittitur forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court:

The resolution of intention, upon which the assessment is founded, was, among other things, that Folsom Street, from First to Second, be repaired “ where necessary,” and that “ curbs and sidewalks thereon be reconstructed where necessary,” etc. Upon the authority of Richardson v. Heydenfeldt, 46 Cal. 68, and People v. Clark, ante, 456, the judgment and order denying a new trial are affirmed. Remittitur forthwith.

People v. Ladd, 47 Cal. 603 (Cal. 1874).

Pincite

47 Cal. 603 (People v. Ladd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related