Himmelmann v. McCreery

California Supreme Court

Himmelmann v. McCreery

51 Cal. 562

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1877

DocketNo. 5182

StatusPublished

This text of 51 Cal. 562 (Himmelmann v. McCreery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Himmelmann v. McCreery, 51 Cal. 562 (Cal. 1877).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court:

The resolution of intention, and the order directing the work to be done, provided: “That sidewalks be constructed on Shotwell street, from Fourteenth to Eighteenth streets, where not already constructed; and that the sidewalks thereon be reconstructed where necessary.”

On the authority of Richardson v. Heydenfeldt, 46 Cal. 68; People v. Ladd, 47 Id. 603, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded, with direction to the court below to enter judgment on the findings in favor of the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court:

The resolution of intention, and the order directing the work to be done, provided: “That sidewalks be constructed on Shotwell street, from Fourteenth to Eighteenth streets, where not already constructed; and that the sidewalks thereon be reconstructed where necessary.”

On the authority of Richardson v. Heydenfeldt, 46 Cal. 68; People v. Ladd, 47 Id. 603, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded, with direction to the court below to enter judgment on the findings in favor of the defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 Cal. 562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/himmelmann-v-mccreery-cal-1877.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack